KellyJonLandis
12-24-2004, 10:52 AM
HIV DENIAL OR INFORMED AIDS DISSENT?
DID YOU KNOW hundreds of dissenting or dissident scientists, including Nobel Laureates and members of the National Academy of Sciences, confirming alternative medicine's long questioning of the virus/germ mode or 'one-cause, one-course' drug-based model, are calling into question the dominant, conventional pharmaceutically-based scientific and medical hypothesis for the alleged viral pathogenesis and progression of 'HIV=AIDS?'
ARE THE NEWER CLASS OF AIDS DRUGS RESPONSIBLE FOR DECLINES IN DEATHS?
YOU GOTTA HAVE HAART [or Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy]? INDEX OF ARTICLES, PAPERS ON THE NEW CLASS OF AIDS DRUG COCKTAILS http://healtoronto.com/ptease.html
CDC data on number of AIDS cases and AIDS deaths. AIDS cases and deaths CLEARLY begin to decline *PRIOR* to the release of new "miracle" drugs! (Taken from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/stats/hivsur92.pdf). However, only 19% of so-called "HIV-positive" people were on the new drugs by the end of June *1996* (see: http://www.retroconference.org/2001/abstracts/abstracts/abstracts/494.htm ). Also, the dosage of the TOXIC AZT has been lowered SUBSTANTIALLY (by at least 50%) since its release in 1987. See THIS GRAPHIC for related information.
Who Counts as Socalled "Long-Term Non-Progressors?"
http://forums.delphiforums.com/innocuous/messages?msg=180.1
AIDS DISSIDENT SCIENTIFIC SUMMARY ANALYSIS
what is hiv?
No laboratory has ever obtained an undisputed sample of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), despite countless attempts. Most laboratories, clinics and medical corporations have come to accept indirect signs, or 'markers', such as antibody reactions, proteins, genetic fragments, 'virus-like' particles, enzymes - that could suggest a virus but also other things - as proving the presence and existence of an 'HIV'.
If such a virus were ever isolated by standards applicable until the late 1970s, the expectations are that it would be a retrovirus - a concept of viruses adopted in the early 1970s. The genetic code of a retrovirus would work 'backwards' - 'retro' - transforming RNA to DNA. Most retroviruses are known as harmless passenger viruses a part of all of endogenous or naturally occuring genetic make-up. 'HIV' has never been found in suficient quantities to kill T-Cells and in fact there is no concensus even after 20+ years as to 'HIV's cytotoxic or cell killing mechanism. For a decade, researchers thought cancer was caused by a retrovirus. Professor Peter Duesberg, UC Berkeley, isolated the first retrovirus and is a Father of Retrovirology says 'HIV' is a harmless passenger virus that does not cause the syndrome known as 'AIDS.'
In 1984 some signs suggesting a possible new virus were detected in cell cultures by the scientific teams of Frenchman Luc Montagnier in Paris, and American Robert Gallo in Washington, who were trying to explain a single cause for 'AIDS'. The French called their findings Lymphadenopathy Associated Virus (LAV), the Americans called theirs Human T-cell Lymphotrophic Virus III (HTLV-III). The US Government announced at a press conference in 1984 that a new virus was "the probable cause of AIDS," yet before any scientific papers inviting peer scrutiny were published. When such papers appeared in Science some weeks later, a dispute erupted between Montagnier and Gallo. Gallo was found guilty of scientific misconduct by a Senate Ethics Committee, for misappropriating material and photographs of 'virus- like' particles from the French. Because of the financial stakes - Gallo and the US government applied for a patent for tests for 'HIV' the day of the press conference - the matter was eventually solved only by a closed meeting between the scientists which produced an official history of events, and a meeting between the US and French Presidents.
However, neither Gallo nor Montagnier ever managed to purify samples of the virus they claimed to have detected. Many scientists believe that without fulfiling this traditional primary requirement of virus isolation, multiple confusions at the molecular biological level are inevitable over what or whether anything has actually been found. To this day, primary purification of 'HIV' has never been achieved. The last attempts, published in 1997 in Virology, revealed proteins and genetic fragments from microvesicles - sub-cell particles - but no virus.
hiv antibody tests
INDEX OF ARTICLES, PAPERS
http://www.healtoronto.com/hivtest.html
Over the years of the HIV/AIDS theory, different types of test have been used to try to detect such a virus in patients. These have included (1) antibody tests, which look for a reaction in a person's blood between their natural antibodies and synthetic proteins said to belong to HIV, and (2) Polymerase Chain Reaction - PCR - or 'viral load' genetic tests, which purport to use part of the virus' genetic code to detect its presence.
All these tests are indirect, or surrogate. They do not claim to detect any whole virus. Rather, they use markers to infer whether a virus might be present. Unfortunately for the accuracy of these tests, these same markers can be found in a variety of non-HIV situations. No HIV test of any kind has ever been validated against the one measure that is not indirect - the gold standard: physical virus isolation. This is because isolation of HIV by the previously conventional standards of viral isolation has never been achieved, despite numerous attempts.
Of the antibody tests for HIV, there are two main types - called ELISA, and Western Blot. Neither was designed especially for HIV, but are examples of laboratory methodologies used in many investigations. Around the world many companies market their versions of the ELISA and Western Blot antibody tests for HIV.
However, the uncertain, unvalidated nature of these tests is reflected in the product literature supplied by their manufacturers.
A typical example for the ELISA reads:
"At present there is no recognised standard for establishing the presence or absence of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human blood." - Axsym System, Abbott Laboratories
A typical example for the Western Blot reads:
"Do not use this kit as the sole basis of diagnosis of HIV-1 infection." - Epitope, Organon Teknika
===============================================
RESOURCES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
The GROUP for the SCIENTIFIC REAPPRAISAL
of the HIV/AIDS HYPOTHESIS [100s of pages of articles, papers]
http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/find.htm
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL [BMJ]
MODERATED ONLINE DEBATE ON HIV/AIDS http://bmj.com/cgi/eletters/326/7387/495
[especially note referenced contributions of The Perth Group of Austrailian AIDS Dissident Scientists, lead by biophysicist Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos, whose other extensive archives are found here http://www.theperthgroup.com and here: http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/perthgroup/]
Roberto Giraldo, MD
President of The Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis http://www.robertogiraldo.com/eng/papers/papers.html
TREATING AND PREVENTING ILLNESS ATTRIBUTED TO OR ASSOCIATED WITH "AIDS"
http://www.robertogiraldo.com/eng/papers/TreatingAndPreventingAIDS.html
REBUTTAL TO NIAID/NIH "Evidence for HIV" DOCUMENT
http://www.healtoronto.com/nih
INTERNATIONAL AIDS PANEL, INTERIM REPORT
Synthesis of deliberations by the panel of experts invited by the President of South Africa, Thabo Mbeki and the ten experiments the Panel designed in attempt to resolve the controversy, endorsed by the African National Congress [AIDS Dissidents/'Denialists' and AIDS Apologists/Orthodoxy]
http://www.polity.org.za/govdocs/reports/aids/aidspanel.htm
REBUTTAL TO DURBAN DECLARATION http://thedurbandeclaration.org/
HEAL [Health Education AIDS Liason]
http://www.healtoronto.com
ANOTHER LOOK [Breastfeeding and 'HIV/AIDS']
http://www.anotherlook.org
MOMM [Mothers Opposing Mandatory Medicine]
http://www.informedmomm.com
AIDS MYTH EXPOSED
[Largest AIDS forum on MSN]
http://www.aidsmythexposed.com
HIV/AIDS ALTERNATIVE VIEWS
[Largest AIDS forum on Delphi]
http://forums.delphiforums.com/innocuous
SIGN and READ SIGNATORIES OF THE ONLINE PETITION TO SUPPORT SOUTH AFRICAN PRESIDENT THABO MBEKI's SEARCH FOR THE TRUTH ABOUT THE DEFINITION, DIAGNOSIS, CAUSATION AND PREVENTION OF 'HIV/AIDS:' http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/news/mbeki.htm
DID YOU KNOW hundreds of dissenting or dissident scientists, including Nobel Laureates and members of the National Academy of Sciences, confirming alternative medicine's long questioning of the virus/germ mode or 'one-cause, one-course' drug-based model, are calling into question the dominant, conventional pharmaceutically-based scientific and medical hypothesis for the alleged viral pathogenesis and progression of 'HIV=AIDS?'
ARE THE NEWER CLASS OF AIDS DRUGS RESPONSIBLE FOR DECLINES IN DEATHS?
YOU GOTTA HAVE HAART [or Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy]? INDEX OF ARTICLES, PAPERS ON THE NEW CLASS OF AIDS DRUG COCKTAILS http://healtoronto.com/ptease.html
CDC data on number of AIDS cases and AIDS deaths. AIDS cases and deaths CLEARLY begin to decline *PRIOR* to the release of new "miracle" drugs! (Taken from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/stats/hivsur92.pdf). However, only 19% of so-called "HIV-positive" people were on the new drugs by the end of June *1996* (see: http://www.retroconference.org/2001/abstracts/abstracts/abstracts/494.htm ). Also, the dosage of the TOXIC AZT has been lowered SUBSTANTIALLY (by at least 50%) since its release in 1987. See THIS GRAPHIC for related information.
Who Counts as Socalled "Long-Term Non-Progressors?"
http://forums.delphiforums.com/innocuous/messages?msg=180.1
AIDS DISSIDENT SCIENTIFIC SUMMARY ANALYSIS
what is hiv?
No laboratory has ever obtained an undisputed sample of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), despite countless attempts. Most laboratories, clinics and medical corporations have come to accept indirect signs, or 'markers', such as antibody reactions, proteins, genetic fragments, 'virus-like' particles, enzymes - that could suggest a virus but also other things - as proving the presence and existence of an 'HIV'.
If such a virus were ever isolated by standards applicable until the late 1970s, the expectations are that it would be a retrovirus - a concept of viruses adopted in the early 1970s. The genetic code of a retrovirus would work 'backwards' - 'retro' - transforming RNA to DNA. Most retroviruses are known as harmless passenger viruses a part of all of endogenous or naturally occuring genetic make-up. 'HIV' has never been found in suficient quantities to kill T-Cells and in fact there is no concensus even after 20+ years as to 'HIV's cytotoxic or cell killing mechanism. For a decade, researchers thought cancer was caused by a retrovirus. Professor Peter Duesberg, UC Berkeley, isolated the first retrovirus and is a Father of Retrovirology says 'HIV' is a harmless passenger virus that does not cause the syndrome known as 'AIDS.'
In 1984 some signs suggesting a possible new virus were detected in cell cultures by the scientific teams of Frenchman Luc Montagnier in Paris, and American Robert Gallo in Washington, who were trying to explain a single cause for 'AIDS'. The French called their findings Lymphadenopathy Associated Virus (LAV), the Americans called theirs Human T-cell Lymphotrophic Virus III (HTLV-III). The US Government announced at a press conference in 1984 that a new virus was "the probable cause of AIDS," yet before any scientific papers inviting peer scrutiny were published. When such papers appeared in Science some weeks later, a dispute erupted between Montagnier and Gallo. Gallo was found guilty of scientific misconduct by a Senate Ethics Committee, for misappropriating material and photographs of 'virus- like' particles from the French. Because of the financial stakes - Gallo and the US government applied for a patent for tests for 'HIV' the day of the press conference - the matter was eventually solved only by a closed meeting between the scientists which produced an official history of events, and a meeting between the US and French Presidents.
However, neither Gallo nor Montagnier ever managed to purify samples of the virus they claimed to have detected. Many scientists believe that without fulfiling this traditional primary requirement of virus isolation, multiple confusions at the molecular biological level are inevitable over what or whether anything has actually been found. To this day, primary purification of 'HIV' has never been achieved. The last attempts, published in 1997 in Virology, revealed proteins and genetic fragments from microvesicles - sub-cell particles - but no virus.
hiv antibody tests
INDEX OF ARTICLES, PAPERS
http://www.healtoronto.com/hivtest.html
Over the years of the HIV/AIDS theory, different types of test have been used to try to detect such a virus in patients. These have included (1) antibody tests, which look for a reaction in a person's blood between their natural antibodies and synthetic proteins said to belong to HIV, and (2) Polymerase Chain Reaction - PCR - or 'viral load' genetic tests, which purport to use part of the virus' genetic code to detect its presence.
All these tests are indirect, or surrogate. They do not claim to detect any whole virus. Rather, they use markers to infer whether a virus might be present. Unfortunately for the accuracy of these tests, these same markers can be found in a variety of non-HIV situations. No HIV test of any kind has ever been validated against the one measure that is not indirect - the gold standard: physical virus isolation. This is because isolation of HIV by the previously conventional standards of viral isolation has never been achieved, despite numerous attempts.
Of the antibody tests for HIV, there are two main types - called ELISA, and Western Blot. Neither was designed especially for HIV, but are examples of laboratory methodologies used in many investigations. Around the world many companies market their versions of the ELISA and Western Blot antibody tests for HIV.
However, the uncertain, unvalidated nature of these tests is reflected in the product literature supplied by their manufacturers.
A typical example for the ELISA reads:
"At present there is no recognised standard for establishing the presence or absence of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human blood." - Axsym System, Abbott Laboratories
A typical example for the Western Blot reads:
"Do not use this kit as the sole basis of diagnosis of HIV-1 infection." - Epitope, Organon Teknika
===============================================
RESOURCES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
The GROUP for the SCIENTIFIC REAPPRAISAL
of the HIV/AIDS HYPOTHESIS [100s of pages of articles, papers]
http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/find.htm
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL [BMJ]
MODERATED ONLINE DEBATE ON HIV/AIDS http://bmj.com/cgi/eletters/326/7387/495
[especially note referenced contributions of The Perth Group of Austrailian AIDS Dissident Scientists, lead by biophysicist Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos, whose other extensive archives are found here http://www.theperthgroup.com and here: http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/perthgroup/]
Roberto Giraldo, MD
President of The Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis http://www.robertogiraldo.com/eng/papers/papers.html
TREATING AND PREVENTING ILLNESS ATTRIBUTED TO OR ASSOCIATED WITH "AIDS"
http://www.robertogiraldo.com/eng/papers/TreatingAndPreventingAIDS.html
REBUTTAL TO NIAID/NIH "Evidence for HIV" DOCUMENT
http://www.healtoronto.com/nih
INTERNATIONAL AIDS PANEL, INTERIM REPORT
Synthesis of deliberations by the panel of experts invited by the President of South Africa, Thabo Mbeki and the ten experiments the Panel designed in attempt to resolve the controversy, endorsed by the African National Congress [AIDS Dissidents/'Denialists' and AIDS Apologists/Orthodoxy]
http://www.polity.org.za/govdocs/reports/aids/aidspanel.htm
REBUTTAL TO DURBAN DECLARATION http://thedurbandeclaration.org/
HEAL [Health Education AIDS Liason]
http://www.healtoronto.com
ANOTHER LOOK [Breastfeeding and 'HIV/AIDS']
http://www.anotherlook.org
MOMM [Mothers Opposing Mandatory Medicine]
http://www.informedmomm.com
AIDS MYTH EXPOSED
[Largest AIDS forum on MSN]
http://www.aidsmythexposed.com
HIV/AIDS ALTERNATIVE VIEWS
[Largest AIDS forum on Delphi]
http://forums.delphiforums.com/innocuous
SIGN and READ SIGNATORIES OF THE ONLINE PETITION TO SUPPORT SOUTH AFRICAN PRESIDENT THABO MBEKI's SEARCH FOR THE TRUTH ABOUT THE DEFINITION, DIAGNOSIS, CAUSATION AND PREVENTION OF 'HIV/AIDS:' http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/news/mbeki.htm