Register Forum Popular Sites Directory Free Gay Dating Contact Us

Gay Groups

Free Forum & Directory for
the GBLT Community

Go Back   Gay Groups ~ Adult Yahoo MSN Google Gay Groups Directory > Announcements > LifeStyle News
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-14-2004, 03:10 AM   #1
sactoken_916
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: http://www.geocities.com/sactoken_916/secondnature.html
Posts: 9
sactoken_916 is off the scale
Send a message via Yahoo to sactoken_916
Default Civil Unions are Unacceptable

Time for me to chime in on marriage....

As long as the government uses the term "marriage" to define my tax status, the way I hold property, and who my heirs are, my ability to engage in a same sex marriage, and enjoy that same equality as a heterosexual couple is the only issue.

The government created this circumstance, and the laws, codes, and regulations our society runs on use the term "marriage." The constitution also guarantees "equal protection under the law." Those two facts are incompatible with the denial of the rite of marriage to two people of ANY sex.

I used to be willing to accept civil unions or domestic partnerships. As a practical matter, I probably will be unable to enjoy either. However, on principal, marriage is a government defined state of being, and as such anything less is government sanctioned discrimination.

The majority of the population will not see it that way at first. But they will over time. Racial discrimination could not be hidden...one is obviously "of color." Just because our sexual orientation is not so obvious, some are having problems with adjusting to the clear unfairness of their beliefs. But Americans are a fair people who will eventually see that the earth's rotation will not stop...day will not become night...birds will not fall from the sky if a same sex couple is allowed to marry.

Even the gay community is not unified on the issue, as evidenced by the arguments here. But the path ahead is clearly marked and I believe that even the most conservative Supreme Court will not escape the same conclusion if our argument is presented as I have, requiring equal access to civil marriage.

Understand that this is a question of formal public discrimination, since only the state can grant and recognize marriage.

Marriage is not simply a private contract; it is a social and public recognition of a private commitment. As such, it is the highest public recognition of our integrity. Denying it to gays is the most public affront possible to our public equality.

The concept of civil unions or domestic partnerships opens up a legal Pandora's Box of subjective judicial decision making about who qualifies and where. You either are, or are not, married; it's not a complex question. Whether you are a domestic partner is not so clear, and could not possibly be made clear without years of litigation and clarification in all the states.

Try this on a straight friend: Ask them to consider what their life would be like if they were never allowed the opportunity to cement their relationships with marriage. Imagine a life without a recognized family. Tell a young woman her attraction to a young man was unnatural, that her love was illicit, and that her's was a future of being alone...of shame and self-censorship.

Marriage is the only fair, legal answer.

"We shouldn't just allow gay marriage. We should insist on gay marriage. We should regard it as scandalous that two peopole could claim to love each other and not want to sanctify their love with marriage and fidelity."
----Conservative Columnist David Brooks in the NYTimes.


From the Human Rights Campaign:

Comparing marriage to civil unions is a bit like comparing diamonds to rhinestones. One is the real deal...the other is not.

Key issues:

Married people receive Social Security payments on the death of a spouse. Despite paying payroll taxes, gay and lesbian partners receive no survivor's benefits, resulting in an average income loss of $5,528 upon the death of a partner.

Americans in bi-national relationships are not permitted to petition for their same-sex marriage partners to immigrate. As a result, they are often forced to separate or move to another country.

A married person automatically inherits all of the property of his or her deceased spouse without paying estate taxes. A gay or lesbian taxpayer is forced to pay estate taxes on property inherited from a deceased partner.

While a married person can roll a deceased spouse's 401k funds into an IRA without paying taxes, a gay or lesbian American who inherits a 401k can end up paying 70 percent of it in taxes and penalties.

Laws protect married seniors from being forced to sell their homes to pay high nursing home bills; gay and lexbian seniors have no such protection.

After the death of a worker, most pension plans pay survivor benefits only to a legal spouse of the participant. Gay and lesbian partners are excluded from such pension benefits.
__________________
Kenito from Baja-Gay
sactoken_916 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2004, 07:10 PM   #2
totosadog
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calif.
Posts: 2
totosadog is off the scale
Default I would prefer civil unions

I'm not in a closet, and i'm happy with who i am, i think that bush hi-jacked the presedency, and i'm pro choice, i think something created the universe but not necessarily jesus's father, so i'm not exactly a conservative egg head. i don't like the word orange it's not the color i don't like it's the word so lets use the word purple for the color orange. what is it that you want, isn't it the same rights that a man and a women have in a hetro UNION a union that throughout history has been called marriage, is it wrong to re-write history ? no sometimes it's necessary, is it necessary this time? really, and there is no alternative ?

being a gay man of color i'd like to just add this...i have suffered far greater acts of racism from the white gay community, than i have from the white hetro community, it seems to me that there are far greater concerns within the white gay community that should be addressed other than the definition of terms, but you always get your way.. you move into the poor neighborhoods of san francisco, new york and l.a, gentrify the place, bring in your trendy this and that, place door-men at your bars with instructions on who to keep out, raise the rents push the poor ethnic population out and then scream bloody hell about discrimination if someone does'nt agree with every agenda you table, i digress. it's 2004 by the time 3004 rolls around, your time will have passed and then maybe we'll have some real equality.
totosadog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[size=18] Gay unions : plan a honeymoon : GAY B & B in P friendlyfrenchy LifeStyle News 0 07-25-2004 05:00 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:43 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.